Is Digital Art Real Art?
by Arun Dev 1The Internet has become a worldwide marketplace where virtually everything is peddled online ranging from books, movie tickets, and kitchen gadgets to automobiles, luxury cruises, and fine art. No matter what you're in the market for, you'll find it online. When it comes to browsing online art galleries, you're likely to come across examples of both fine art and digital art. But what's the difference? And is digital art real art?
To better understand the differences between fine and digital art, let's first define fine art. According to Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition, fine art is defined as: Art (as painting, sculpture, or music) concerned primarily with the creation of beautiful objects.
Now, let's define digital art. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia explains that digital art is a contemporary art form where computer technology is manipulated to create distinctive works.
With those definitions in mind, a beautiful oil painting is considered fine art while a breathtaking collage of electronic images would be considered digital art. While you may be able to reach out and touch the brushstrokes on a painting or feel the contours of a sculpture, digital art tends to be less tangible, often appearing on a computer monitor or video display. Thus, the question often arises as to its legitimacy as a real art form.
Digital art also suffers from a perception that, because the artwork is created on a computer, it has less value than a one-of-a-kind object of fine art. Photographers encountered these same perceptions as a single photographic negative or slide is capable of creating countless identical copies of the image. While a digital artist could theoretically mass produce digital art, many digital artists have adopted the same techniques that photographers and lithographers have used successfully: limited editions.
The way that viewers interact with fine art and digital art is different as well. For the most part, looking at fine art is a static experience. Sure, the piece may evoke strong emotions as you look at it, but the experience is primarily visual. Digital art often incorporates multiple images, transitions, audio, and video; the artwork may change based on the viewer's actions or movements, especially if touch screens or integrated video cameras are involved.
While fine art is displayed on walls, book shelves, pedestals, and other areas where you can enjoy it, digital art often requires electronic displays. Static digital artwork can be printed on paper or canvas and hung like traditional fine art paintings while multimedia artwork needs a suitable display such as a computer. Digital picture frames and flat panel TV's with suitable inputs open digital artwork display possibilities that didn't exist just a few years ago.
Clearly, fine art and digital art have their differences. But is digital art real art? To answer that question, ask the following questions when looking at a piece of digital art: Is it beautiful? Does it evoke emotions? If you answer yes to either of these questions, the digital art is indeed real art.
About the Author
Article Source Free Article Database
For anyone that has ventured across the Atlantic, there is a notable cultural divide between the UK and the US. It is not subtle in any way, with everything from commonly spoken phrases to driving on the other side of the road underlining the fact that these two corners of the world are very different. And yet, when it comes to musicals in London and New York, there are many examples of shared successes, suggesting that there is considerable common ground when it comes to what their respective audiences find entertaining.
The translation of humour and drama is, in fact, long established, and the list of transatlantic triumphs is extremely long, not just on the stage but in film and music too. But with theatre goers generally recognised as more discerning, it is notable just how well stage productions have done. The demand for tickets for jersey boys, for example, has been remarkable, with two years of success already enjoyed in the West End.
When it comes to adaptations of former animation hit films, such as the lion king, tickets have sold extremely well also, though this is a very different genre. Nevertheless, there are reasons why they have succeeded to the degree they have.
For some shows, it is not hard to understand why audiences have flocked to their productions. Chicago, for example, is one of the most famous musicals in the world, with a 2002 film adaptation contributing to a reinvigorating boost in interest. The film, which starred Richard Gere, Catherine Zeta Jones and Renee Zellweger, was nominated for 13 Oscars, winning six, bringing the musical to the attention of millions of people who might not otherwise have had much interest in a theatre show.
Of course, it was already well established in the theatre world, having originally opened on Broadway in 1975 with an initial run of more than two years. It transferred to the West End in 1979, winning critical acclaim but it was almost 20 years before the show was revived on either side of the Atlantic. Since returning to the West End in 1996, opening first at the Adelphi Theatre before moving to the Cambridge Theatre in 2006, it has not stopped running.
And the reason for its outstanding success can be put down to two factors. The first is, of course, the popularisation of the musical through the success of the film, which attracted a new generation of fans. The second is the general love of the big musical production, which offers the promise of a greater and more memorable theatre experience for any theatre goer.
The musical jersey boys is a different type of show, however, and began its life in San Diego in 2004. And yet, it has also proved to be a major draw for audiences in London. The reason is primarily the interest the content of the show has, with the musical depicting the story of the pop group of the 1950s and 1960s, Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons. Understandably, the success of the group four decades earlier, ensured a root interest even in London, with Frankie Valli fans set to attend the show from the start. The quality of the show, its music, direction and production, earned it an Olivier award for its debut West End season in 2008.
Finally, the third success story comes from the lion king, but there is little mystery in its success. The fact is that the lion king tickets are as sought after by parents looking to treat their children to a family night out as they are by adults that loved the original 1994 film animation. The multi Oscar winning film was adapted for the stage in 1997, becoming an instant success after opening first in Minneapolis. Its Broadway record was no less impressive, and has been running there since November 1997.
The popularity of the film in the UK may have ensured it would be a success when it crossed the Atlantic in 1999, but the popularity of its music and of its composer, Elton John, has also had an influence.
Clearly, while tickets for jersey boys may well be desired by fans of Frankie Valli, and the lion king be loved by fans of the animation, it is clear that the shared interested of UK and US audiences ensures successful musicals in New York can also be successful musicals in London.
Kathryn Dawson writes articles about musicals in Londo, where in this city you will be spoilt for choice. London is home to many award winning shows such as The Lion King, Billy Elliot, Phantom of the Opera as well as Jersey Boys, which are popular and good seats are often unavailable. London Tickets use Albemarle of London for all purchases so it means you can buy tickets for jersey boys and lion king tickets easily and safely, and with good seating too.
Article Source: http://www.articlesphere.com/Article/Why-Original-American-Musicals-in-London-Prove-So-Successful/251603